The reaction after the events of September 11 was very different. People voluntarily went in front of the cameras and microphones, or spoke freely with representatives of the print press. Even those people who had been directly affected by the crisis—who had been in the buildings that were hit and survived, or who had lost members of their families, friends, or neighbors—spoke openly with the press. People seemed not only willing to talk but even to have a need to share their stories, emotions, and grief in front of large audiences. I think this represents a dramatic turnaround in the popular culture of the United States. Fifteen or twenty years ago it would have been unimaginable that people overcoming a tremendous grief would willingly share their innermost feelings with the pubic. The media have not changed; the shift has basically occurred in the general public.
The Wall Street Journal published an article that criticized the broadcast media for replaying recorded exchanges between people trapped in the World Trade Center towers and the police's 911 center. On these calls, people were crying for help and realizing that there would be none. The tapes are heartbreaking, and they were played again and again by the broadcast media. In response, the Wall Street Journal spoke of prime-time pornography in an October 8 editorial:
 |
In one respect, I think, the commentator was right: Journalistic ethics should require consideration for the privacy rights of people. Yet I also think that the general public as well as the media may have become desensitized to public displays of pain and grief, resulting in an overall cultural change. Today, people commonly watch entertainment shows in which individuals bare their innermost feelings and reveal the details of their private life. Many, if not most, people in the public now find such behavior to be normal.
|